Will Congress Sanction Grand Larceny, Commit Treason?
Posted on | March 10, 2010 | No Comments
By Xelan Bonn (March 10, 2010) www.xelanbonn.com
It’s one of the largest crimes in US history perpetrated on the American people by millions of criminals and now Congress is about to sanction and reward it while forcing taxpayers to foot an additional multi-trillion dollar penalty—and break the highest law in the land to do it—the US Constitution! (1)
Today, nearly 18 percent of the nation’s work force is unemployed. About 8.5% fall into the category of having lost their unemployment benefits and have given up looking for work, thus are not tabulated in official news media accounts. The other 9.7% we hear about everyday—the people hoping and praying for unemployment extensions and the government to change its corrosive policies so they can get back to work and feed their families. This is a group that has not given up yet but remains equally hopeless due to a federal government that clearly stands against them. (2a)
At cause for these and many more ills of the nation is a mass foreign invasion of criminal workers that is flourishing, left completely unattended by the federal government. (2b) Most Americans know this foreign invasion under a obfuscating political code word—illegal immigration—or more deceptively as merely “immigration”—a nomenclature meant to gain sympathy for the millions of thieves on US soil. Make no mistake, these people are thieves in every sense of the word criminally.
Let’s begin with the realty that in many states it is a felony to falsify employment identification documents or work unlawfully. Yet an estimated 10 to 16 million illegal aliens are doing just that. How do we know they are guilty of crimes such as document fraud, forgery, and a long list of other possible crimes—because they are working illegally and in order to do that, they must have false documents suitable to fool employers.
If a US citizen commits the same criminal act, they will typically spend years in jail if caught. If a US citizen steals $10,000 or more per year, they will go to jail for what could be a decade. Yet today, millions of illegal aliens are committing these crimes, committing felonies in order to secure work and then stealing work from US citizens who need and want their jobs—making 15, 20, 40, even 100 thousand dollars a year—all criminally, forcing millions of US citizen families into poverty and in some cases starvation. (3) And Congress wants to reward them!
The eternal propaganda cry is that these people just want a better life for themselves. Sure, at the expense of US taxpayers and workers even if it means committing several felonies to get it—as if that somehow justifies the criminal act. It’s equal logic to want to forgive a bank robber for her crimes because she just wanted a better life for her and her family—and then worse, not punishing that bank robber when caught because we “can’t separate the thief from their family by putting them in jail”—that would somehow be too cruel and inhumane. Who thinks this stuff up? Extremist liberals and propaganda ministers perhaps, but not sane, law respecting and law abiding citizens who know right from wrong.
Illegal immigration is not immigration at all. It is a “foreign invasion” and a direct attack on the economic and national security of the US citizenry, their states, and America. That is the technical legal reality.
“Immigration” is much differently described under the law—it is the act of law abiding people of foreign nations migrating under legal sanction to a new host country with the intent of becoming a legal and upstanding citizen in that country. Now does that describe illegal aliens who attempt to bypass the immigration lines and come to the US illegally by creeping over the border or deliberately overstaying their visas, or committing various felonies in order to arrive and work illegally in the US?
The propaganda ministers want Americans to think this issue is about “race”. Okay, great, which race—given that every color including Whites, and nearly every ethnicity on the planet are among the massive illegal alien invasion population. Sorry, but that “racism” remark is a mere smoke screen meant to keep the conversation off the facts.
Under current law, the federal government has not an option, but a legally mandated requirement to “abate” the “foreign invasion” and protect US citizens and states from harm. They are forbidden from invoking an “amnesty” of any kind. The law that states this fact is the US Constitution, Article IV, Section IV. Attempting to sanction a foreign invasion with any form of amnesty is not only illegal, but if among the group sanctioned are one or more of a “declared enemy of the United States” such as Al Qaeda, then such an act can legally be construed as “treason”—are you listening Congress?
The laws of treason do extend to Congress and they do not have a statue of limitations—members can later be charged with the crime and put on trial by subsequent Congresses or White House Administrations—even decades later. Something to think about.
An amnesty, that is, anything that allows an illegal alien to remain on US soil, is strictly unconstitutional because it sanctions foreign invasion and harm to US citizens and the states they live in. The federal government does not have such a legal option. They are required by law to abate the foreign invasion and safeguard Americans. The law does not refer to “war” and “armed foreigners” but specifically to a “foreign invasion” that causes harm.
We know illegal aliens currently cost American US taxpayers well over $300 billion per year in net costs, once we account for their contributions to the system. (1) We know they are putting over 6 million, perhaps as many as 16 million US citizens out of work while artificially depressing wages and lowering our collective standard of living by working for lower wages that depress wages for all workers. We know they are collectively killing about 9,000 US citizens per year in one form or another, from murder to drunk driving, etc.. (1) And the list of harms, of what we know, is extremely long—nearly all detrimental to America and US citizens. In short, these “foreigners” who are on US soil illegally (“invading”) are causing “great harm” to states, US citizens, and America. Hence this meets with all legal requirements of the “foreign invasion” protection clause of Article IV, Section IV of the US Constitution.
In mundane terms, if you forward an amnesty, it means, unequivocally, that you forward the breaking of the highest law in the land—a 200+ year old law and the very tenants that helped build this nation. It means you stand against the US Constitution—forget everything else—it means you sanction the violation of law and the tearing down of your nation, not to mention bestowing great harm on US citizens and their families. Yes, there are hundreds of other aspects to this highly complex issue, but they all pale in comparison to this fact. Your self-denial or refusal to believe it is not enough to overcome these facts.
We are either a nation that respects the law, respects our Constitution, respects our fellow citizens, or we are not. If we are not, that is, if we no longer respect the highest law in the land, then we have no law period for the Constitution is a contract between the people and their states and the federal government. If that contract is broken, then it means the federal government has no authority over any of us—that means the contract is off—that means the road is open to complete anarchy. Is that your, our, intent?
Learn the facts and think before you decide to go down the road to hell in order to save foreign criminals because you think it is the most humane thing to do. It is not. You are helping foreign criminals and harming law abiding US citizens and their families in the exchange.
Additionally, millions of people could actually die once an amesnty passes or the Constitution is determine obsolete and mass rioting spreads into Revolution—we are closer to such a reality than most believe—but keep playing with fire and watch this nation burn for it. Only by upholding the law, even when it seems unpopular or inhumane at times, may we preserve order and America.
And if all said was not enough remember this fact. This nation cannot afford to add between $4 and $36 trillion in new debt over the next 30 years to pay for an unconstitutional amnesty and the harmful mass chain migration from Third World countries that it will spur. (1) America is already near country-collapse debt levels now, and an amnesty bill, with a massive hidden price tag such as this one, is completely unconscionable–likely soverign suicide. (4)
If Congress forwards their unconstitutional amnesty bill to the floor and votes on it, each person in that chamber will have committed a criminal act. If US citizens let them get away with it, they will be equally complicit in the crime against their own country. It is as simple as that.
References
(1) Basically, everything mentioned here can be found with sources previously referenced in articles elsewhere on this blog. However, if you really must doubt me, and I hope you do because I want you to do your own research and get involved, then I suggest you read the US Constitition and the Operaton Safe America (PDF report) and most of what you need for fact verification can be found documented in the there.
(2a) Facts Prove Obama Against US Workers (June 16, 2009)
http://xelanbonn.com/192/facts-prove-obama-against-us-workers/
(2b) Illegal Immigration: Facts Very Scary
http://www.xelanbonn.com/718/illegal-immigration-facts-are-very-scary/
(3) Bloomberg: Senate Approves $138 Billion Bill Extending Unemployment Aid
http://www.bloomberg.com/apps/news?pid=20601087&sid=aj54ARnTfC4k
It’s funny, all this spending and additions to the national debt could be avoided by giving Americans their jobs back and enforcing the laws. I hope you’re happy with criminal government, because that’s what you have my dear fellow Americans.
(4) US Controller General Predicts US Banlruptcy And Collapse
http://xelanbonn.com/276/us-controller-general-predicts-us-bankruptcy-collapse/
AND
America’s Death Predicted In Just 3 Years
http://xelanbonn.com/280/americas-death-predicted-in-just-3-years/
Tags: 2010 amnesty > aliens > Amnesty > amnesty bill > Code Word > Criminal Act > Document Fraud > Employment Identification > ending illegal immigration > False Documents > Felony > foreign invasion > Fraud Forgery > Grand Larceny > illegal aliens > Illegal Immigration > Ills > immigration bills pending > immigration wars > Nomenclature > Official News > Thieves > Treason > Trillion > trillion dollar price tag > unconstitutional > Unemployment Benefits > Unemployment Extensions > Us Constitution > Xelan
Campaign Financing Reform: Part 4—Details
Posted on | March 7, 2010 | No Comments
By Xelan Bonn (March 6, 2010) www.xelanbonn.com
If you haven’t read Part I or Part II or Part III yet, please take a moment to read them so this section will make more sense to you.
Well, I was going to fill in this section of the article but the problem is I misplaced my file on it. Now if I were getting paid to do this, or I thought for one minute these ideas would be put into a bill where they could do us some good, I would certainly hunt the information down and slap it up here. It’s really a pretty sweet and effective system I devised but I did it a very long time ago and I do not recall all the details.
For now, just realize that this nation is under the control of special intersts (which controls Congress with it’s money and power) and not voters. With all the money and influence in Washington now, that is never going to change until either America falls or voters get angry and stay angry and get organized and stay organized.
Only campagin finance reform can change this reality by taking power away from special interests and putting it back into the hands of voters and their representatives who will then be free to vote their conscious. What’s sad for us all is that only Congress can invoke campaign finance reform and special interests would never allow them to do it. We have the wolf in charge of the hen house and that wolf loves to eat his hens so although we may have good ideas and intentions, it’s a complete waste of time until we can vote out all incumbants and only vote in those who will promise, under penatly of jail time, that they will sign-on to a pre-writen plan of campaign finance reform and work to get it into law.
If Tea Partiers or others want me to prepare that document, then contact me, otherwise, I’m skipping this subject for a while (at least until I find my documents or someone pays me to work on it).
Part I Into | Part II Proposal | Part III Commentary | Part IV Details
Tags: Bonn > Campaign Financing > Campaign Reform > Proposal > Remedy
Campaign Financing Reform: Part 3—The Whys…
Posted on | March 7, 2010 | No Comments
By Xelan Bonn (March 6, 2010) www.xelanbonn.com
If you haven’t read Part I or Part II yet, please take a moment to read them so this section will make more sense to you.
Corporations, which the US supreme court has given status equal (some would say above) those of any US citizen, could be limited in the precise way as US citizens in their campaign financing rules. If, for example, a US citizen can donate up to $3,000 in a year for a campaign, then so should and could the limit be made on corporations. Thus, the playing field is leveled and US citizens and their voice remain heard in the body politic. Care must be given to ensure the amount is in reasonable reach to at least 50% of all taxpayers.
Rules denying domestic corporations with strong tries to foreign or transnational corporations or who are transnational corporations from not being allowed to participate in any political messaging whatsoever ensure that undue foreign influence is kept out of domestic elections. There is no doubt that the Founders wanted Americans, not foreigners to decide our elections (hence have the power to influence them).
The same rules need to apply to international nonprofits with domestic arms (i.e. Move On, La Raza, etc.) which also do not represent the American citizenry but instead have foreign influence contamination (conflict of interest).
Prohibiting Internet donations that do not include payment by check and proper I.D. (i.e. Driver’s License) should help eliminate most online abuses. In the last presidential election, for example, it is claimed that as much as 25% of funds to the Obama campaign came from countries such as China, Saudi Arabia, Iran, and other offshore sources, which is illegal but difficult, currently, to validate.
Such reform aspects will resolve the vast majority of current campaign financing loopholes so long as we can eliminate candidates (or the public) having to foot the bill for their greatest campaigning expense—and we can. Here’s how…
Public Owned Licenses = Free Pubic Use Airtime Reserves
Most Americans do not realize that the public actually owns the rights to all airwaves in the United States. All broadcasting licenses are owned not by the broadcasting companies, but by We The People.
The federal government leases the airwaves through licenses to private companies (i.e. ABC, CBS, NBC, etc.) with certain rules and restrictions. All Americans have to do is have their government rewrite the rules and restrictions on such broadcasting licenses.
New rules would include designating that the broadcaster set aside a certain percentage of its airtime as designated by the federal government, for the use by the Public Campaign System. The broadcaster would be required to also provide both access and facilities and system to candidates on a set fee schedule (about the break-even cost of electricity and equipment depreciation only—a very small fee to offset the broadcaster’s out of pockets only—not loss of airtime, etc.).
Each election, all authorized candidates would then be issued, free of charge from the broadcaster or government, their allotment of free Public Campaign System airtime.
If any broadcaster does not like the Public Campaign System or its rules or cost impacts, then they are free to turn their licenses back into the federal government so that other willing parties can take them up. (There will be no takers on that, by the way).
Yes, broadcasters will lose yearly campaign revenues (from the current system), however, the alternative is they could lose their licenses altogether instead of merely less than about 1% of the year’s total airtime—which, in turn, is put to a higher use for the greater public good instead of the privately held broadcasters for mere profit purposes. Currently, broadcast licenses are cheap in comparison to the revenues they allow broadcasters to generate so broadcast license fees would not need to be reduced for broadcasters in order to compensate them for any perceived losses.
By incorporating this system, we will open up the playing field to more candidates, preferrably those with higher integrity and leadership skills, while also removing most of the corporate and foreign influence from the system. This proposal stays within the legal confines of US Supreme Court Rulings and the Constitution using already establish systems and laws, just in more voter/public friendly ways.
The court has ruled that corporations are to be considered equal to citizens in all ways, hence if we treat them exactly like voters in most ways, we level the playing field by restricting the influence of wealthy corporations. Remember, corporations cannot cast votes, but they can use their vast wealth over the average citizen to bypass the will of the people. They have great (some would say unfair) access to tools of influence through means and methods afforded them with their wealth—wealth the average citizen does not have—allowing them to affect greater mass persuasion using highly sophisticated techniques of manipulation and social engineering to sway voters toward electing candidates that support their corporate position, not the true position of voters neccessarily.
If we cannot eliminate the corporation from the poltical playing field (most Americans agree they do not belong there, as they cannot cast votes, etc. but the Supreme Court says otherwise), then we can at least keep them within the confines of the average citizen and their respective means and ability to sway elections as well. No more will only the wealthy have control of our elections and candidates, and no more will the average voter be marginalized.
Now, with respect to how we allot the airtime to each candidate, let’s save that aspect for Part IV of the Public Campaign System discussion.
Part I Into | Part II Proposal | Part III Commentary | Part IV Details
Tags: Airtime > American Citizenry > Campaign Financing > Campaigning > Conflict Of Interest > Contamination > Domestic Corporations > Foreigners > Founders > Internet Donations > Loopholes > No Doubt > Nonprofits > Presidential Election > Reform Aspects > Remedy > Saudi Arabia > Taxpayers > Transnational Corporations > Us Citizen > Us Supreme Court > Whys > Xelan
Campaign Financing Reform: Part 2—No Cost Solution
Posted on | March 7, 2010 | No Comments
By Xelan Bonn (March 6, 2010) www.xelanbonn.com
Hopefully you read Part I before coming here (if not, please take a moment and do that so this makes more sense to you).
Here’s my proposed solution in a nutshell:
1. Restrict all personal and corporate campaign contributions to one amount for all (for example, $3,000 maximum contribution by any legal entity, alive or inanimate).
2. Eliminate all indirect campaign assistance by all entities. (For example, a wealthy special interest group or corporation cannot outspend another entity or average voter to overly influence the election).
3. Require the federal government to pay for all federal elections and campaigns (see Part II and Part IV schedules).
4. Require all private and government contributions be paid through US banks to campaign accounts directly (eliminate any and all Internet donations or donations from overseas that do not come via official US government embassies/citizens). Require all donors to label their payment (check or money order) with either their legal ID or if an entity, their taxpayer ID (for tracking, verification and certification purposes).
5. Provide banks with policing regulations to ensure all funds are US based and in no way connected to foreign interests.
6. Require corporate donors to provide bi-yearly certification stating they are not controlled by foreign interests (that their stockholders, officers, and mangers are at least 90% US citizen or under ownership and management control). Set a penalty of perjury and imprisonment for the CEO and Chairman in the event the certificate proves fraudulent or negilgently inaccurate (but make compliance rules simple and straight forward). Require corporations to file the certificates with the appropriate government authority before being allowed to donate to campaigns. (To be fair and equal to all entities–ensure voters use a valid voter card to contribute to campaigns)
7. Provide for election watchdog funding to private organizations that: 1) claim impartiality, 2) claim nonpartisanship, 3) are not connected in any way to any candidate or government agency, 4) that have all employees background checked (nobody hired who is a felon or fraudster), 5) all employees required to take certification test proving their competency.
8. Companies or international organizations or entities of any kind with ties to foreign businesses or government or who are principally owned by foreign corporations or citizens through stock and bond controls or other legal leverages are to be designated (in another bill) as “foreign entities” and prohibited from any and all political influence or campaign contributions, including lobbying (they are to be treated for what they truly are, transnational entities holding no instrinsic allegiance to America and no vested interest in the welfare of the American people, hence denied all political influence. (They are, of course, not restricted from commerce or bidding on government contracts as may be allowed by current law).
9. Maintain the current rules regarding federal funds for campaign financing with the exception of those rules which must be modified in order to comply with this new system. For example, a lowering of the minimum funds needed to qualify.
10. Set up two independent citizen watchdog organizations (and give them funding) in each state to conduct independant spot-checks or any poll or election or certification system. Give them the ability to report their findings directly to the public to ensure further eliminations of election and voter fraud and government information blocking or censorship.
Part I Into | Part II Proposal | Part III Commentary | Part IV Details
Tags: Campaign Assistance > Campaign Contributions > Campaign Financing > Certification Purposes > Certification Test > Compliance Rules > Corporate Campaign > Corporate Donor > Corporate Donors > federal elections > Fraudster > Government Authority > Government Contributions > Impartiality > Internet Donations > Legal Entity > Legal Id > Management Control > Mangers > Maximum Contribution > Penalty Of Perjury > Private Organizations > Proposed Solution > Special Interest Group > Taxpayer Id > Verification Purposes > Xelan
Campaign Financing Reform: Part 1—Kill Corruption
Posted on | March 7, 2010 | No Comments
By Xelan Bonn (March 6, 2010) www.xelanbonn.com
In the US, the major expense for all candidates is their need to run the majority of their ads on the air (radio and TV) in order to get their message out to voters. (1)
In 2008, the average cost to win a House seat ran $1.36 million and Senate chair $7.5 million. (4) More desperate to win candidates spent between $29.9 to $63.2 million—a very shocking contrast.
According the Federal Election Commission, $1.68 billion was spent by all presidential candidates and the two major parties through September 30, 2009. (6) This does not include monies spent directly by special interests, such as unions, corporations, etc. For example, Obama’s campaign was dramatically aided by special interests, such as Service Employees International Union (SEIU) that went on a door knocking campaign to finally invest about $27 million from both its members and the voters they swayed. (5)
What’s not being counted here is perhaps the most significant aspect of all elections—the little known candidate underdogs. Each year, many hopefuls rise but for a moment then disappear into obscurity simply due to having no financing system or start-up backing. They are not “well run” by strong corporate interests. What this means is that those who may otherwise be good potential leaders with integrity willing to work on behalf of the public’s interest (not corporate interests) are not getting a chance. They are routinely being overstepped because money, not character and integrity, are often at odds.
Certainly there can be no doubt that if it takes a great deal of money to secure a seat, then those who provide the most money will be entitled to the most favors once the candidate gets into power. Look at the SEIU example—a $27 million investment turned into what some claim is over a $1/2 billion in contracts and other concessions—in fact the president of the group, the alleged radical communist Andy Stern, was chiefly responsible for the drafting the recent financial bail-out legislation exceeding over $1 trillion—no conflict of interest or corruption there, right Mr. President?
In order to clean up the Capitol Hill whoring of America and taxpayers, what will be needed are a few things: 1) voters need to remove the current corruptors—all incumbents for the next 6 years—to clean out all contaminants, 2) create a public campaign financing system (preferably tax/cost neutral) so that more candidates with integrity and willingness to serve the public interests instead of corporate and special interests can be encouraged to come forward (and then given the tools they need once they do), and 3) an overhaul of current campaign financing laws, especially regarding corporate and foreign entity participation and influence.
To date, many public campaign financing solutions have been forwarded but none that are cost or tax neutral—except one (which we’ll get to in a moment). For example, groups like Washington Public Campaigns have forged new public financing models that are sound in principal but lacking in execution—they simply place the election and campaign cost burden on taxpayers almost completely. (3) Most other variations and approaches do the same as well.
However, such cost and tax impacts to taxpayers can all but be eliminated and one small, highly elite, highly wealthy corporate handful would feel the pinch—but not enough to jump ship if such a remedy were invoked.
In Part II, I’ll present a basic proposal that bill makers can use to clean up our elections and campaigns to help give us better government and leaders.
Part I Into | Part II Proposal | Part III Commentary | Part IV Details
References
(1) University of Wisconsin, Advertising Project
http://wiscadproject.wisc.edu/
(2) USA Today: Candidates Spend $195 Million On Campaign Ads (June 2, 2008)
http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/2008-06-02-2187728261_x.htm
(3) Washington Public Campaigns
http://www.washclean.org/
(4) The Campaign Finance Institute: The Cost Of Winning An Election (1986-2008)
http://www.cfinst.org/data/pdf/VitalStats_t1.pdf
(5) CNS News: SEIU PAC Spent $27 Million Supporting Obama’s Election, FEC Filing Says (Dec 19, 2008)
http://www.cnsnews.com/Public/Content/article.aspx?RsrcID=40959
(6) Federal Election Commission: Public Campaign Finance
http://www.fec.gov/DisclosureSearch/mapApp.do?cand_id=P80003338&searchType=&searchSQLType=&searchKeyword=
Tags: Air Radio > Andy Stern > Campaign Financing > Communist > Concessions > Corporate Interests > Federal Election Commission > Hopefuls > Monies > No Doubt > Obscurity > Presidential Candidates > Radio And Tv > Reform Campaign > Seiu > Senate Chair > Service Employees International Union > Shocking Contrast > Special Interests > What This Means > Xelan